Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Front Public Health ; 8: 602988, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1004712

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak rapidly became a public health emergency affecting particularly the frail category as cancer patients. This led oncologists to radical changes in patient management, facing the unprecedent issue whether treatments in oncology could be postponed without compromising their efficacy. Purpose: To discuss legal implications in oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspective: Treatment delay is not always feasible in oncology where the timing often plays a key role and may impact significantly in prognosis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the oncologists were found between the anvil and the hammer, on the one hand the need to treat cancer patients aiming to improve clinical benefits, and on the other hand the goal to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection avoiding or delaying immunosuppressive treatments and hospital exposure. Therefore, two rising scenarios with possible implications in both criminal and civil law are emerging. Firstly, oncologists may be "accused" of having delayed or omitted the diagnosis and/or treatments with consequent worsening of patients' outcome. Secondly, oncologists can be blamed for having exposed patients to hospital environment considered at risk for COVID-19 transmission. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical decision making should be well-balanced through a careful examination between clinical performance status, age, comorbidities, aim of the treatment, and the potential risk of COVID-19 infection in order to avoid the risk of suboptimal cancer care with potential legal repercussion. Moreover, all cases should be discussed in the oncology team or in the tumor board in order to share the best strategy to adopt case by case.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/economics , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/therapy , Oncologists/economics , Pandemics/economics , Adult , Female , Guilt , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oncologists/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J AAPOS ; 24(4): 195-196, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-662993

ABSTRACT

The use of telemedicine tools has increased significantly due to the COVID-19 emergency and practice restrictions imposed by states. As restrictions are loosened, telemedicine is a cost effective and efficient way to render care to patients. Suggestions are offered for maintaining contact with patients, managing their expectations for care, and rendering care in a prudent and timely manner. By following these steps, professional liability risk (medical malpractice) can be mitigated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/methods , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL